AstroBoy
Recent Actions
-
Commented on China's Mir?
Meh ... China's had designs for space stations floating around for many years. Ditto reusable spaceplanes. They offered up a model space station back in 2000: http://www.astronautix.com/graphics/c/chistat2.jpg I really wouldn't read too much into this. China, for all the propaganda... -
Commented on LCROSS Slams Into The Moon
The thing that depresses me about this story is how much ignorance has been displayed. But then that happens with every space-related story that rises to the level of the mass media. Some days I wish more people were informed...
Comment Threads
-
Ben the Space Brit commented on
China's Mir?
IMHO, history will record Sergei Korolev (and Valentin Glushko to a lesser degree), not Werner von Braun, as the father of human space travel in the 20th and 21st Centuries. Soyuz and Soyuz heritage LVs and spacecraft will probably be around until the 2030s at the very least....
-
eep commented on
China's Mir?
Frank: why should the Soyuz be called the "greatest manned spacecraft ever designed and evolved" - because the design was in operation the longest? In terms of manned spacecraft, it stands apart from others only by virtue of having flown for so long with little incident. In terms of capacity and capabilities, I'd say the Shuttle Orbiter is the "greatest." Those features of come with their own set of problems, but the Shuttle aspires to be (and is) more than a simple people-mover; that's something that Soyuz will never be able to accomplish. I would say that one reason that...
-
Mark commented on
China's Mir?
"I really wouldn't read too much into this. China, for all the propaganda they trumpet about their space program, isn't very interested in spending too much money on its space program" Can we sell them ISS at a bargain rate? Lease it?...
-
Ed Griffith commented on
China's Mir?
This would be an excellent opportunity to face small budgets for NASA, stop pretending as we have for almost half a century that budgets will increase at some unspecified future time, and to push for international cooperation. The ISS was a success as far as international cooperation. Other countries get that they do not have unlimited funds for space exploration. We should also and lead for international space exploration. Power point presentations did not get us into space in the first place and will not help us in the future. I would rather see a realistic limited plan that has...
-
Frank Sietzen commented on
China's Mir?
eep, because the thing just keeps going and going-bailing out the Americans so we can still access "our" space station, and giving rise to both Chinese and Indian manned spacecraft. The Shuttle orbiters, in hindsight, will be seen as a novel experiment in extraordinary technology, but ultimately one that was unaffordable and fragile. The Space Shuttle did not evolve into anything-except perhaps a heavy lift booster-nor was it the model other nations copied successfully (anyone remember Hermes? Another unaffordable spaceplane project). As much as I wish it were not so, Soyuz and its derivitives have put us to shame....
Following
Not following anyone
About This Page
Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.
Monthly Archives
- September 2010 (10)
- August 2010 (107)
- July 2010 (123)
- June 2010 (117)
- May 2010 (126)
- April 2010 (107)
- March 2010 (99)
- February 2010 (144)
- January 2010 (74)
- December 2009 (91)
- November 2009 (109)
- October 2009 (151)
- September 2009 (108)
- August 2009 (110)
- July 2009 (170)
- June 2009 (151)
- May 2009 (116)
- April 2009 (119)
- March 2009 (111)
- February 2009 (86)
- January 2009 (128)
- December 2008 (119)
- November 2008 (120)
- October 2008 (142)
- September 2008 (134)
- August 2008 (122)
- July 2008 (119)
- June 2008 (130)
- May 2008 (128)
- April 2008 (146)
- March 2008 (102)
- February 2008 (82)
- January 2008 (113)
- December 2007 (112)
- November 2007 (100)
- October 2007 (108)
- September 2007 (99)
- August 2007 (136)
- July 2007 (73)
- June 2007 (118)
- May 2007 (102)
- April 2007 (118)
- March 2007 (108)
- February 2007 (131)
- January 2007 (104)
- December 2006 (95)
- November 2006 (77)
- October 2006 (114)
- September 2006 (120)
- August 2006 (117)
- July 2006 (130)
- June 2006 (123)
- May 2006 (113)
- April 2006 (122)
- March 2006 (136)
- February 2006 (104)
- January 2006 (115)
- December 2005 (71)
- November 2005 (99)
- October 2005 (94)
- September 2005 (117)
- August 2005 (104)
- July 2005 (122)
- June 2005 (152)
- May 2005 (107)
- April 2005 (148)
- March 2005 (138)
- February 2005 (94)
- January 2005 (82)
- December 2004 (93)
- November 2004 (82)
- October 2004 (73)
- September 2004 (64)
- August 2004 (53)
- July 2004 (37)
- June 2004 (8)
- May 2004 (8)
- March 2004 (4)
- February 2004 (1)
- January 2004 (7)
- December 2003 (5)
- November 2003 (2)
- October 2003 (1)
- September 2003 (2)
- August 2003 (1)
- July 2003 (1)
- June 2003 (1)
- May 2003 (1)
- April 2003 (1)
- March 2003 (1)
- February 2003 (1)
- January 2003 (7)
- December 2002 (3)
- December 2001 (2)
- December 2000 (2)
- December 1999 (2)
- December 1998 (2)
- December 1997 (2)
Categories
- Aeronautics (131)
- Aircraft (6)
- Ares, Orion, Altair, Constellation (331)
- Ask The Administrator (18)
- Astrobiology (95)
- Astronauts (156)
- Astronomy (47)
- Budget (376)
- Canadian Space Agency Watch (1)
- Cape Canaveral (16)
- China (78)
- Columbia (35)
- Commercialization (880)
- Congress (357)
- Culture (109)
- Earth Science (95)
- Education (340)
- Election 2004 (50)
- Election 2008 (125)
- Exploration (1021)
- Financial Management (39)
- Gorby (3)
- Hubble (82)
- ISS News (559)
- IT/Web (141)
- Internet Policies (75)
- NASA Culture (21)
- New Moon Rising (7)
- News (1413)
- Personnel News (632)
- Policy (166)
- Poll (2)
- Procurement (17)
- Russia (99)
- Safety (20)
- Shuttle News (672)
- Shuttle News 1997-2003 (9)
- Space & Planetary Science (720)
- Space Elevators (3)
- Space Tourism (3)
- Transition (137)
- Videos (175)
- Workforce (80)
- suborbital (4)
Copyright © Reston Communications. All rights reserved. This site is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
This website does not have any connection whatsoever with, endorsement by, or authorization from, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration nor does any product or service being offered or made available to the public have the authorization, support, sponsorship, or endorsement of, or the development, use, or manufacture by or on behalf of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration
