jkl
Recent Actions
-
Commented on Remembering Apollo 1, Challenger, and Columbia
inordinate? - Exceeding reasonable limits If that is true they were not courageous. They were foolish. And I don't buy that. I believe they (and the manager and engineers) knew there were large risks in the Apollo program. Given the... -
Commented on Mike Griffin's ESAS Architecture is Dead
Bla, Bla, Bla. Smoke without fire. The fact is that NASA is not an administration priority. The Republicans concentrated human spaceflight activity into states Obama does not care about. He was fairly clear during the election that space was not... -
Commented on Close Call For Courtney Stadd
Hum… An ankle bracket? I guess the judge mistook a white collar thief for a guy who robs the 7-11. What crimes may he be inclined to commit that electronic monitoring will deter? He made $7,000 a moth off swindling...
Comment Threads
-
cm commented on
Mike Griffin's ESAS Architecture is Dead
"there are legitimate and serious national security implications of access to and control of cislunar space and our government is dropping that ball, possibly forever." I couldn't agree more with this. I hope 2010 & 2012 get some like-minds to DC....
-
Flash001 commented on
Mike Griffin's ESAS Architecture is Dead
pspudis: "...there are legitimate and serious national security implications of access to and control of cislunar space and our government is dropping that ball, possibly forever." I agree also. One ray of hope is the X-37B. At least it can do some of the job. Maybe a larger, X-37 derivative could be manned....
-
KC commented on
Mike Griffin's ESAS Architecture is Dead
>I agree also. One ray of hope is the X-37B. Isn't the X-37B an unmanned vehicle?...
-
Flash001 commented on
Mike Griffin's ESAS Architecture is Dead
Re the X-37B: Yes, it's unmanned--that's why I also wrote: "Maybe a larger, X-37 derivative could be manned." But even unmanned it can do some of the retrieval-type things the shuttle did, and could act as a space tug for de-orbiting large space junk, using a remote-controlled robotic arm. If it works out as a spacecraft, there would be a proven template, and functional components towards a crew vehicle. That means a lot in the mundane business of actually delivering a real thing, instead of impressive artists' concepts, like DynaSoar, HL-42, Hermes, X-33 etc. In fact, an eventual manned version...
-
Flash001 commented on
Remembering Apollo 1, Challenger, and Columbia
"Inordinate" is an understatement. The design and workmanship of the Apollo 1 capsule interior was insane. There was not simply a risk of a fire, there was little chance there could not be a fire. Of course there are inherent dangers in riding a rocket into space, but the Apollo 1 environment added an extreme additional danger that was not needed....
Following
Not following anyone
About This Page
Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.
Monthly Archives
- February 2010 (47)
- January 2010 (74)
- December 2009 (91)
- November 2009 (109)
- October 2009 (151)
- September 2009 (108)
- August 2009 (110)
- July 2009 (170)
- June 2009 (151)
- May 2009 (116)
- April 2009 (119)
- March 2009 (111)
- February 2009 (86)
- January 2009 (128)
- December 2008 (119)
- November 2008 (120)
- October 2008 (142)
- September 2008 (134)
- August 2008 (122)
- July 2008 (119)
- June 2008 (130)
- May 2008 (128)
- April 2008 (146)
- March 2008 (102)
- February 2008 (82)
- January 2008 (113)
- December 2007 (112)
- November 2007 (100)
- October 2007 (108)
- September 2007 (99)
- August 2007 (136)
- July 2007 (73)
- June 2007 (118)
- May 2007 (102)
- April 2007 (118)
- March 2007 (108)
- February 2007 (131)
- January 2007 (104)
- December 2006 (95)
- November 2006 (77)
- October 2006 (114)
- September 2006 (120)
- August 2006 (117)
- July 2006 (130)
- June 2006 (123)
- May 2006 (113)
- April 2006 (122)
- March 2006 (136)
- February 2006 (104)
- January 2006 (115)
- December 2005 (71)
- November 2005 (99)
- October 2005 (94)
- September 2005 (117)
- August 2005 (104)
- July 2005 (122)
- June 2005 (152)
- May 2005 (107)
- April 2005 (148)
- March 2005 (138)
- February 2005 (94)
- January 2005 (82)
- December 2004 (93)
- November 2004 (82)
- October 2004 (73)
- September 2004 (64)
- August 2004 (53)
- July 2004 (37)
- June 2004 (8)
- May 2004 (8)
- March 2004 (4)
- February 2004 (1)
- January 2004 (7)
- December 2003 (5)
- November 2003 (2)
- October 2003 (1)
- September 2003 (2)
- August 2003 (1)
- July 2003 (1)
- June 2003 (1)
- May 2003 (1)
- April 2003 (1)
- March 2003 (1)
- February 2003 (1)
- January 2003 (7)
- December 2002 (3)
- December 2001 (2)
- December 2000 (2)
- December 1999 (2)
- December 1998 (2)
- December 1997 (2)
Categories
- Aeronautics (131)
- Aircraft (6)
- Ares, Orion, Altair, Constellation (256)
- Ask The Administrator (18)
- Astrobiology (92)
- Astronauts (139)
- Astronomy (41)
- Budget (276)
- Canadian Space Agency Watch (1)
- China (76)
- Columbia (35)
- Commercialization (741)
- Congress (226)
- Culture (95)
- Earth Science (90)
- Education (299)
- Election 2004 (50)
- Election 2008 (123)
- Exploration (938)
- Financial Management (38)
- Gorby (3)
- Hubble (80)
- ISS News (512)
- IT/Web (115)
- Internet Policies (66)
- NASA Culture (16)
- New Moon Rising (7)
- News (1337)
- Personnel News (572)
- Policy (96)
- Poll (1)
- Procurement (16)
- Russia (96)
- Safety (17)
- Shuttle News (602)
- Shuttle News 1997-2003 (8)
- Space & Planetary Science (680)
- Space Elevators (3)
- Space Tourism (3)
- Transition (131)
- Videos (137)
- Workforce (26)
- suborbital (1)
Copyright © Reston Communications. All rights reserved. This site is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
This website does not have any connection whatsoever with, endorsement by, or authorization from, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration nor does any product or service being offered or made available to the public have the authorization, support, sponsorship, or endorsement of, or the development, use, or manufacture by or on behalf of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration
